Sigil of the Mythic Scribe

Yantra of the Sacred Descent

The Scribe’s Call is open ↓

Yantra of the Sacred Descent • The Means of Production • MMXXVI

Every press keeps a figure it does not name out loud: the one who writes down what arrives. Not the author — the author is a later invention, and a more flattering one. The scribe is older and less well paid. The scribe's whole discipline is to receive a thing without improving it.

This is that figure drawn as a machine. The descent runs top to bottom through the plate's vertical axis, and everything on the way down is a check on the hand: degrees, gates, petals, a seal. Meaning does not fall cleanly from anywhere. It is stepped down, the way voltage is, through apparatus that takes a cut at every stage.

The astonishing objects are the press's calls and the evidence its machinery leaves behind. Most of them face outward — they attract, they receive, they announce. This one faces the other way. It is the instrument the press turns on itself at the moment a submitted text is set down in the record: the reminder that transcription is an operation with bounds, and that the bounds are the ethics.

Those bounds are written out plainly elsewhere — The Audit is the authority on what a published entry actually records, and how far the hand may go. This yantra is the same doctrine with the argument taken out. It does not explain. It sits there and turns, which is roughly what a discipline feels like from the inside.

And because a discipline with no door is only a decoration, this object carries a call of its own — the Scribe’s Call, below. It asks for one thing the other doors do not.

Scriptor non fingit · Scriptor recipit The scribe does not invent. The scribe receives, and the receiving is the work.

Send us what you took down.

The press keeps four other doors, and they all ask the same question: what did you make? This one asks a narrower one, and it is the only door here that asks it.

Send us work that was taken down rather than composed. Something dictated, overheard, transcribed, copied out, translated badly on purpose, recorded and then set in type. Court minutes, voicemail, a fight through a wall, a manual, a prayer someone else was saying, a machine's output you sat with long enough to be responsible for. The material can be anyone's. The taking down has to be yours.

  • Work where the hand is visibly restrained — you could have improved it and did not.
  • Sources named, or the refusal to name them made part of the piece.
  • The apparatus left in: timestamps, gaps, inaudibles, the wrong word kept because it was the word.
  • Transcription that turns on its source, or fails to, and shows the failure.

Polished lyric that merely mentions listening. Found-text collage assembled for texture alone. If the piece would be unchanged had you invented the source, send it to the Call of Issue Two instead — that door is open and wider.

  • No entry fee. No payment. We are a small press with no budget and we say so plainly.
  • First publication rights only. Everything else stays yours.
  • Three readings, filed. A critical audit accompanies anything published — non-negotiable; it is how the magazine works.
  • Simultaneous submissions welcome. Withdraw if it lands elsewhere; no hard feelings.

This is the field this call exists for. If you tell us nothing else, tell us this.

We read everything. Response within one full turn of the gear — roughly 6–10 weeks.

Or send it to editor@themeansofproduction.press with the subject line Scribe — [title].

← Return to the Astonishing Objects